PDA

View Full Version : dyno results

Drywallman
08-22-2005, 09:38 AM
Did this Saturday here in Salt Lake City.
Kinghen
08-22-2005, 11:13 AM
I have seen very similar results online. Why do they rate them at 106 in the brochure? Measured at engine? I have yet to see one test at 100+.

Thanks for posting this BTW. :)
Wyandotte Kid
08-22-2005, 07:09 PM
Nice solid numbers Dry dude. All manufactors post a theoritical hp number at the crank. A number of different thing eat hp before it gets to the road.
Kinghen
08-22-2005, 10:00 PM
Nice solid numbers Dry dude. All manufactors post a theoritical hp number at the crank. A number of different thing eat hp before it gets to the road.

Well alrighty then. ;)

I figured something was taking it just curious as to what specifically. It is all good. 90+ horse on the road certainly will get you there quickly :P
Drywallman
08-22-2005, 11:21 PM
Thanks for the replies, I do have 1300 Final Drive installed, wonder if that would change any of the results?
Wyandotte Kid
08-23-2005, 07:09 PM
Everything that the motors turn eats hp. Tranny, flywheel, wheels. The biggest thief on our bikes is the shaft. It has to change the direction of the power twice before it reachs the rear wheel. It is the most trouble free way to deliver power but it eats the most power. There are folks investing time and money trying to figure out a belt drive. I'd like to see it.
cos
08-27-2005, 02:44 PM
Nice solid numbers Dry dude. All manufactors post a theoritical hp number at the crank. A number of different thing eat hp before it gets to the road.

They don't want to look like they inflate numbers.
ILuvUMan
09-09-2005, 09:05 PM
Everything that the motors turn eats hp. Tranny, flywheel, wheels. The biggest thief on our bikes is the shaft. It has to change the direction of the power twice before it reachs the rear wheel. It is the most trouble free way to deliver power but it eats the most power. There are folks investing time and money trying to figure out a belt drive. I'd like to see it.

Exactly right. Honda shows 107 HP and 120.2 Foot Lbs. of torgue. Obviously these readings are measured at the crank.

Not trying to be argumentative, but one really can't get a meaninful reading on a Dynometer until they get a least 10 readings (in graduate school I learned a statiscal sample of at least 30 is required, before significant errors of variance become irrelevant).

Here's a goo website to read http://www.dynoperformance.com/article_details.php?ID=14
Drywallman
09-10-2005, 09:07 AM
My bike was run 34 times. I think that, that was enough, don't you?
ILuvUMan
09-10-2005, 01:54 PM
I see 2. :)

:choppersm
Wyandotte Kid
09-10-2005, 06:55 PM
A difference of 1% to 2% in statisticaly insignificant.
Drywallman
09-10-2005, 07:30 PM
A difference of 1% to 2% in statisticaly insignificant.
Agreed :spank:
Drywallman
09-10-2005, 07:34 PM
I see 2. :)

:choppersm
001 thru 034 runs, took 2.5 hrs for fine tuning. 001 being the first run before any adjustments and 034 being the final run results.
ILuvUMan
09-12-2005, 08:25 PM
You are not only incorrect in your premise statistically, but you are also incorrect in your conclusion statistically.

I'd explain why, but as you so eloquently have said on other website's, "your not worth my breath" (and yes I spelled it exactly as Drywallman did, which is sic). :choppersm
Drywallman
09-12-2005, 10:55 PM
I spank you Dave :spank: (ILuvUMan). Your a senile old fart that just likes to argue over really nothing at all. If you really had a clue at what your doing towards your self and other potential friends, I wouldn't fell sorry for you. But since senility is so bad I do fell sorry for you or should I say pitty you. :icon_poke :icon_yes: